<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missing Links: Where Are They? Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rationalfaithonline.com/missing-links-where-are-they-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rationalfaithonline.com/missing-links-where-are-they-part-1/</link>
	<description>Exploring the rationality of the existance of God and the Christian Worldview</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missing Links: Where Are The Transitional Forms?</title>
		<link>http://rationalfaithonline.com/missing-links-where-are-they-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Missing Links: Where Are The Transitional Forms?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalfaithonline.com/?p=796#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...] Missing links: Where Are They? Part 1  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Missing links: Where Are They? Part 1  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://rationalfaithonline.com/missing-links-where-are-they-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalfaithonline.com/?p=796#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to comment, Reilly.  You always have something insightful to say...I think I&#039;ll just compile a bunch of your comments and put together an article the next time I&#039;m having a busy week :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment, Reilly.  You always have something insightful to say&#8230;I think I&#8217;ll just compile a bunch of your comments and put together an article the next time I&#8217;m having a busy week :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reilly</title>
		<link>http://rationalfaithonline.com/missing-links-where-are-they-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalfaithonline.com/?p=796#comment-84</guid>
		<description>The lack of transitional fossils is an exceptional example of why Darwin&#039;s &#039;theory&#039; of evolution is exactly that- a &#039;theory&#039;. Merriam-Webster defines a theory as &#039;a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena&#039;. That is not to say it is scientifically PROVEN- just PLAUSIBLE. I think so many today take evolution as fact and forget that we have yet to prove it as a mechanism by which our change has been metered out- much less how we were created from the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of transitional fossils is an exceptional example of why Darwin&#8217;s &#8216;theory&#8217; of evolution is exactly that- a &#8216;theory&#8217;. Merriam-Webster defines a theory as &#8216;a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena&#8217;. That is not to say it is scientifically PROVEN- just PLAUSIBLE. I think so many today take evolution as fact and forget that we have yet to prove it as a mechanism by which our change has been metered out- much less how we were created from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
