Comments on: Problems With Evolution: Science, Religion, Facts and Bias http://rationalfaithonline.com/problems-with-evolution-science-religion-facts-and-bias/ Exploring the rationality of the existance of God and the Christian Worldview Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:18:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Moral Argument: No Morality if No God http://rationalfaithonline.com/problems-with-evolution-science-religion-facts-and-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-91 Moral Argument: No Morality if No God Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:34:12 +0000 http://rationalfaithonline.com/?p=535#comment-91 [...] the moral argument we’re back into the philosophical realm  after a foray into a bit about science and religion.   A welcome change from my perspective, so I hope some of you feel the [...] [...] the moral argument we’re back into the philosophical realm  after a foray into a bit about science and religion.   A welcome change from my perspective, so I hope some of you feel the [...]

]]> By: Missing Links: Where Are The Transitional Forms? http://rationalfaithonline.com/problems-with-evolution-science-religion-facts-and-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-88 Missing Links: Where Are The Transitional Forms? Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:53:40 +0000 http://rationalfaithonline.com/?p=535#comment-88 [...] other areas of the animal kingdom, no theory around human evolution is uncontested even within the evolutionary establishment.  What is consistent is the idea that humans did evolve from apes and there is a missing link out [...] [...] other areas of the animal kingdom, no theory around human evolution is uncontested even within the evolutionary establishment.  What is consistent is the idea that humans did evolve from apes and there is a missing link out [...]

]]> By: Missing Links and Transitional Forms: Where Are They? http://rationalfaithonline.com/problems-with-evolution-science-religion-facts-and-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-83 Missing Links and Transitional Forms: Where Are They? Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:25:50 +0000 http://rationalfaithonline.com/?p=535#comment-83 [...] sheer volume of the number of changes needed would also mean that with any type of gradual evolution, there should be many, many more transitional links in the fossil record than there are [...] [...] sheer volume of the number of changes needed would also mean that with any type of gradual evolution, there should be many, many more transitional links in the fossil record than there are [...]

]]> By: Natural Selection and Evolution: Science and Interpretation | Rational Faith Online http://rationalfaithonline.com/problems-with-evolution-science-religion-facts-and-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-53 Natural Selection and Evolution: Science and Interpretation | Rational Faith Online Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:58:18 +0000 http://rationalfaithonline.com/?p=535#comment-53 [...] by giving a simple definition of natural selection and evolution and then talk a bit about the problems with evolution and the facts surrounding natural [...] [...] by giving a simple definition of natural selection and evolution and then talk a bit about the problems with evolution and the facts surrounding natural [...]

]]> By: Reilly http://rationalfaithonline.com/problems-with-evolution-science-religion-facts-and-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Reilly Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:44:49 +0000 http://rationalfaithonline.com/?p=535#comment-37 Science mandates that all things be proven through the scientific method. If this process cannot prove there is a God and cannot disprove there is a God- how then does science refute the existence of an Almighty Creator? It doesn't. Men's interpretation of science and its application to our world does. It took science hundreds of years to understand, explain and harness electricity. Did our lack of knowledge mean electricity did not exist? Certainly not. We simply had not progressed our understanding sufficiently to account for electricity's attributes. It was always there. Our ability to prove or disprove something does or does not exist is not an effective means by which to solve life's mysteries. Science mandates that all things be proven through the scientific method. If this process cannot prove there is a God and cannot disprove there is a God- how then does science refute the existence of an Almighty Creator? It doesn’t. Men’s interpretation of science and its application to our world does.

It took science hundreds of years to understand, explain and harness electricity. Did our lack of knowledge mean electricity did not exist? Certainly not. We simply had not progressed our understanding sufficiently to account for electricity’s attributes. It was always there. Our ability to prove or disprove something does or does not exist is not an effective means by which to solve life’s mysteries.

]]>