If Everything that Exists Must Have a Cause, then Who or What Caused God?
Hello again!
Thanks to all of you who sent me emails re: this site and signed up for updates and to get the report on the resurrection!
So let’s get right to it…
I told you I’d be discussing the reasons why I believe in Christianity and Jesus Christ and why I believe these are perfectly reasonable and rational beliefs to hold. For me, the best place to start so I can keep my thoughts in order would be the reasons why I believe that God exists at all...
There are several lines of reasoning that point to the existence of God…but before I get into that, I want to discuss a related question I hear all the time:
Everything that exists has a cause, right? So if God is the cause of the universe, what or who made God?
On the surface, this sounds like a legitimate question. Once you scratch the surface, however, there is a major flaw in this line of thinking.
It is not a coherent question.
By definition, the concept of ‘God’ is that of a being that is an ‘Uncaused Cause‘. An entity that always existed and never ‘came into being‘. A being that has no beginning and no end and that created the universe, time, and everything we see around us from nothing.
The question, “Who caused the uncaused cause?’ is an incoherent question akin to “Can God make a square circle?” These are nonsensical questions in that they do not make logical sense.
If the definition of ‘God’, at least by Christian and other monotheistic religions, includes the idea that he is eternal, never had a beginning, and is the ‘Uncaused Cause’ that made everything else, it just doesn’t make sense to ask where He came from. He just is.
Of course, if you believe that God doesn’t exist, then the question ‘Who made God?” has no meaning. If you think there is no God, why would you question whether he had been ‘made’ or not. I’ll be addressing many reasons why I believe He does exist in the next few weeks.
Though it doesn’t do anything to ‘prove’ His existence, hopefully discussing this point may help prevent the misunderstood and incoherent argument that some atheists make against the existence of God when they pose the question of where he came from.
Once you understand what theists mean when they say ‘God‘, the question of who made Him becomes invalid. It’s part of the very definition of who and what He is.
And yes, as I alluded to earlier, there are things Christians believe God cannot do…like make a square circle, or lie and cheat…He made the world a certain way and the Bible teaches us a lot about the nature of God. He cannot act in opposition to His nature (lie) and He cannot do something that is logically impossible (like make a square circle or make a mountain big enough that he can’t lift it)…but that’s a discussion for another day.
So everything that exists does not have a cause…there has to be a first cause that is uncaused… A better way to say it would be “Everything that began to exist has a cause.”
So why do I say there has to be a first cause? Why couldn’t there be a never-ending cycle of cause and effect that goes back in time to infinity?
Well… my wife’s overdue and we’re having a baby in the next couple of days (one way or the other) so I have lots of other things to do at the moment…we’ll have to talk about the reasons an infinite regress of past events is impossible in my next post…
Like always, if this has sparked your interest as all, please comment! by clicking on the comments link at the top.
Also look to the form to the top right (in the margin) and sign in so I can send you updates as they occur…and so you can get the chance to take a look at the super-ultra-secret report I’ll send you…
…actually it’s not so secret since it’s about the biggest event in history and the one that changed the world more than any other…and it has been written about by countless other authors…but I really do find the material very interesting and I spent enough time putting it together, that I hope at least a couple of you read it :)
Until next time,



{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Hey Rod,
Firstly congrats on the new little (or medium sized) guy.
I came across an interesting presentation on Amazing Facts on Vision TV yesterday. Here’s the crux:
Should Christians be observing the Sabbath on Saturday instead of Sunday?
The origins of the change date back around 320 AD when the Roman Emperor Constantine decreed the Empire’s day of worship would be changed from Saturday to Sunday. The state religion was Sun worship. So Christians of the day seemingly bowed to the pressure of political correctness and changed their day of worship to Sunday. And the rest is history. Even in the Roman Catholic Church’s modern catechism there’s a question that asks why the Sabbath is observed on Sunday and not Saturday. The corresponding answer states that it was an institutional change decreed by man (not God).
Was the Sabbath not ordained by God to be on Saturday in the Ten Commandments? God didn’t change it so why do Christians think they have the right to change it? In the Old Testament the punishment for breaking the Sabbath was comparable to breaking any of the other commandments.
Is this an overly legalistic question? The New Covenant is based on love rather than laws. Having said that, if you love God and your neighbour you’ll keep all of the commandments without any conscious effort.
Hmmmmm…
Hey Karl,
Thanks for your interesting comments…and the congrats for my new ‘little’ guy :)
I have never studied this specifically. I know there have been other instances of the early church instituting their own holidays to coincide with other pagan festivities. It helped to keep new converts’ interest in Christianity and keep them from sliding back into their old superstitions. I don’t see any issue with that…I’m glad my church has changed their music to keep up more with the times!
As far as the Saturday-Sunday issue, it’s debated in Christian circles, but to me, I think there are bigger fish to fry. Whether or not you believe in and worship God or not seems to me more important than which day you do it on. Getting sticky on which day seems to smack of legalism.
Paul commented on a similar issue in Romans 14:5-8…. 5) One man considers one day more sacred than another; another man considers every day alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind. 6) He who regards one day as special, does so to the Lord. He who eats meat, eats to the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who abstains, does so to the Lord and gives thanks to God. 7) For none of us lives to himself alone and none of us dies to himself alone. 8 ) If we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die, we die to the Lord. So, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord.
The way I see it from the Christian perspective is that living for Jesus every day is more important than what time during the week we set aside for Him.
Thanks again for your comment!
Rod